AMERICAN FAMILY RADIO's GM – Buster Wilson

Archive for the ‘Personal’ Category

Nobody wants to join the “Death Panels”

This comes from Tony Perkins, FRC, heard daily at 4 pm central on AFR Talk.

Above Board: Experts Scoff at Joining Health Panel

 

Apparently, serving on a government “death panel” isn’t exactly topping people’s bucket lists. This week, the Washington Post explained that ObamaCare’s 15-member “rationing panel” has hit a bit of a snag: no one wants to join it. The Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) was one of the most controversial parts of the President’s legislation–mainly because it puts 15 unelected strangers in charge of health decisions for most Americans. In the name of “cost-certainty,” IPAB would have the authority to limit which specialists you see, what treatments are available, and in some cases, whether you’re eligible for care at all.

Still, the pressure of cutting costs without affecting care isn’t exactly a health industry dream job. “You’re joining an organization that has uncertain authority with the certainty of being deeply political and widely criticized,” said Bob Kocher, a former Obama advisor. “It doesn’t make sense for current thought leaders in American health care to want to do this.” Even Jonathan Gruber, who helped pass ObamaCare, wants no part of it. “No way,” he told reporters.

Unfortunately for Americans, the next best thing to IPAB is just as frightening. If the panel remains unfilled–and Congress doesn’t find an alternative–the power would transfer over to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, who would have the authority to implement her own cost-cutting measures without any accountability whatsoever. How many of you would want Kathleen Sebelius sitting at the controls when you have a health condition? Not me–and certainly not House Republicans. Earlier this month, as part of a rules package, the House voted not to comply with any Medicare cuts that IPAB recommends (which would lead to the rationing conservatives warned about). Although the GOP is desperately trying to block the Board from injecting itself in doctor-patient care, it isn’t likely to change much. Still, good on conservatives for chipping away at the credibility of this and other ObamaCare provisions! Eventually, the rest of the country may catch on and elect leaders who would repeal the law altogether.

And they call US, “haters”?

Recently, I received another one of the mind blowing, vicious tweets from those on the homosexual side:

“gay bashing thug @busterwilson can shove his kill gays bible down his tyrannical theocRAT throat & choke on his JesusFreak koolaid…..”

WOW!  And they call US, “haters”?  Really??

It’s truly sad.  I have NEVER said a word, ever, about “killing gays”.  That doesn’t matter though.  They are convinced we HATE them and want to kill ‘em all!  Doesn’t matter that we have repeatedly said on the air and in print that we are NOT desirous of killing anyone, nor would we be supportive of any effort to “kill gays”.  Doesn’t matter.  Their mind’s made up.

I’ve never said the Bible wants to “kill gays”.  I’ve quoted the verses like Romans 3:23, “All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God….” That speaks to the sin of US ALL, not just sinners who commit homosexual sins:  that’s talking about ALL of us.  And the truth is, if you, me, everyone doesn’t commit our hearts by faith in God’s grace to Jesus Christ as Lord, we WILL A L L die in a devil’s hell (2 Thess. 1:8-12)!  But, I won’t do the killing of unrepentant sinners.  That won’t be my job.

I’ve never preached “theocratic” rule!

And the part about the “JesusFreak Koolaid” is nothing but sheer insult.

I continue to be amazed at how ugly they can be telling us how ugly we are!

If NOT for the boys, then for the MONEY!

The President of the Human Rights Campaign has made this statement about the Boy Scouts changing their decades long position of not allowing homosexual leaders:

“The pulse of equality is strong in America, and today it beats a bit faster with news that the Boy Scouts may finally put an end to its long history of discrimination,” said HRC President Chad Griffin in a statement released by GLAAD. “Our nation and its leaders respect lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender citizens, and it’s time the Boy Scouts echo those values.”

This statement would seem to demonstrate that Big Gay (Bryan Fischer’s great term for the homosexual activist community) has no idea of the difference between “respect” and absolute submission.  BUT THEY DO!

They know that there is no attempt on the part of the Boy Scouts of America to disrespect anyone!  If there is any “disrespecting” going on, it’s how the Human Rights Campaign has disrespected the privately owned Boy Scouts of America, by their extortive means of turning their biggest supporters away from them.

They are indeed, prepared to announce that they have changed their policy of not allowing homosexuals as leaders in the BSA.  They do so ONLY because they have “wilted (BSA’s own term) under the pressure of large corporate donors.  The Human Rights Campaign and others in the Big Gay community, has gone to the corporate supporters of the BSA and told them that if they don’t stop supporting the Boy Scouts, they will literally smear their corporate name and reputation by demoting the “tolerance” position that they have them listed by. And of course, there being no backbone amongst those corporate sponsors, they have in turn pressured the Boy Scouts to change or else lose their sponsorship.

By any standard, in any other story, this would clearly be extortion! And yet, the Boy Scouts are finding that there is nothing to do but give in.

So, Next week, we will hear that the Boy Scouts of America have joined the ranks of the super tolerant and agreed to let each local chapter choose their leaders by their own standards.  In other words, DO AS YOU PLEASE!

 Even though all of America is “a’tingle” with this “pulse of equality”, most of those who are partakers of the Scouting program, are not.  We have heard leader after leader, and parent after parent, tell us that they will NO LONGER support the BSA if they allow the local troops to fall under homosexual leadership.

The Boy Scouts have always prided themselves in doing the right thing for the safety and the good of the boys. There is NO WAY that this action is in any way GOOD for the boys (see my earlier post about my days as a scout and how devastating I believe it will be for there be a group of 11-17 year old boys camping in the woods alone with a homosexual leader!). But as we’ve seen this saga unfold, we’ve learned that it is good for the Boy Scouts of America.  They get to keep their hundreds of thousands of dollars of support from their now placated corporate sponsors.

The old adage, “follow the money”, still works.

Call the Board members, Take A Stand!

The phones are ringing off the wall.

If you’ve tried to get through to the Boy Scouts of America (BSA), you know it’s been tough. If you’ve wanted to express your concern about the BSA abandoning their longstanding policy of safeguarding Scouts by restricting openly homosexual Scout leaders from holding leadership positions, you may have been greeted by an endlessly ringing phone. This may be one instance in which the Boy Scouts were not prepared.

The BSA national leadership were not prepared for the thousands of Americans who were shocked to hear that an organization that could always be counted on for standing for what’s right was about to cave-in to homosexual activists and corporations which have been threatening the organization’s funding.

For generations, the BSA has shaped our nation’s moral character by teaching young men to do their duty to God and country. This is why, when the BSA board begins its annual meeting on Monday of next week, it is so important that you keep the pressure on, to show them how devastating this moral collapse will be for the Scouts and the country.

Please call the members of the BSA Board of Directors (sample call script below) and kindly urge them to stand strong and true to their timeless values:

Select BSA Board Members:

  • David L. Beck: (801) 240-1000
  • R. Thomas Buffenbarger: (310) 967-4500
  • Keith A. Clark: (717) 763-1121
  • William F. “Rick” Cronk: (925) 283-7229
  • John C. Cushman III: (904) 393-9020
  • R. Michael Daniel: (412) 297-4989
  • Jack D. Furst: (972) 982-8250
  • T. Michael Goodrich: (205) 328-9445 ext. 200
  • Earl G. Graves: (212) 242-8000
  • Aubrey B. Harwell Jr.: (615) 244-1713
  • Stephen Hemsley: (800) 328-5979
  • Larry W. Kellner: (713) 468-4050
  • Robert J. LaFortune: (918) 582-2981
  • Joseph P. Landy: (212) 878-0600
  • Francis R. McAllister: (406) 373-8700
  • Scott D. Oki: (425) 454-2800
  • Arthur F. Oppenheimer: (208) 343-4883
  • Tico A. Perez: (407) 849-1235
  • Robert H. Reynolds: (317) 231-7227
  • Matthew K. Rose: (909) 386-4140
  • Nathan O. Rosenberg: (949) 494-4553
  • Roger M. Schrimp: (209) 526-3500
  • Marshall M. Sloane: (781) 395-3000
  • Rex W. Tillerson: (972) 444-1000
  • David M. Weekley: (713) 659-8111
  • Togo D. West, Jr.: (202) 775-1775

Sample Phone Script:

Hello, my name is _________, from __________.

Thank you for your service as a board member of the Boy Scouts of America.

As you’re aware, a new proposal indicates that the Boy Scouts of America may revoke their longstanding policy of safeguarding Scouts by restricting homosexuals from holding leadership positions over boys. For decades, your national organization has kept the interest of the boys it serves as the focus of all its actions. No matter what, the Boy Scouts of America could be counted upon to do the right thing and not yield to any social pressure, and has thus far stood strong.

Please do not jeopardize the safety and moral integrity of Scouting in the interest of social activism. The proposal to relegate the decision on homosexual leaders to local chartered organizations sends the wrong signal from the national body: that political correctness ultimately triumphs over character.

Please retain the current long-held and time-tested policy regarding homosexual leadership and membership. America stands with you. Lead the way. Please stand strong.

Thank you, and God bless you.

Together, we can make a difference in turning the tide and keeping an honorable organization on an honorable path.

Sincerely,

Tony Perkins
President Of Family Research Council, Washington, DC

Extortion Used to Change the Boy Scouts

The untold part of the story regarding the decision of the Boy Scouts of America to change their decades old policy of not allowing homosexuals in as Scout leaders, is the extortion part.  Yes. By the text book definition, there was extortion!

There are several large Corporations who are supporters of the Boy Scouts.  BSA told the Executive Committee of the Southern Baptist Convention that they were, “Wilting under the pressure….” of these corporate sponsors!  

It seems that the Human RIghts Campaign has put the pressure on several of the BSA’s largest corporate sponsors to back out of supporting them or else!  The “or else” means that they would demote that corporation in their status as “tolerant” and “supportive” of the LGBT community and employees unless they stop supporting those “hateful” Boys Scouts!  

Now, I’m the only one so far to use the term, “extortion”.  But what the HRC did fits the dictionary definition perfectly!  They basically told the best sponsors of the Boy Scouts, pull out of sponsoring those “hateful and intolerant” Boy Scouts, or we’ll smear your company’s name!  That, my friend, is extortion.

So, the best and most powerful of the BSA’s corporate sponsors have forced the BSA to change their policy.  I know, they won’t vote on it officially until next week.  But it is obvious to us all that they have already made the change, or at the least, decided to change.

We have sent thousands of callers to the BSA, begging them to stay strong with their current policy of banning homosexuals from leadership.  One caller to my show Thursday, a corporate owner himself, offered to replace some of the the corporate sponsorship they would lose if they would just stay the course!  THEY TURNED HIM DOWN AND WOULDN’T EVEN SPEAK WITH HIM!

I believe that we should shout to the roof tops the names of the corporations that have forced the Boy Scouts of America to begin accepting homosexual leaders.  These corporations unjustly exacted this policy change by the BSA, because they were the objects of that extortive pressure from the Human Rights Campaign.

The corporations that pressured the Boy Scouts are AT&T, Ernst and Young, Bank of America, Intel and UPS who’ve already pressured the scouts individually;  US Bank, Verizon, and Wells Fargo round out the list of sponsors who’ve pressured the Boy Scouts. These businesses have put the pressure on the Boy Scouts to accept Homosexual leaders because they’d rather see that happen than be smeared by Big Gay for continuing to support the Scouts.

Let’s pray for the Boy Scouts, and remember that what matters the most is what’s right for the BOYS, and having homosexuals lead them and take them camping is NOT in their best interest!

Scouting and the “Gay” Decision

For most of my childhood from about age 7 through my teen age years, I was a part of a Scouting program of some sorts. In the younger days, I was, of course, a Cub Scout. Then, once I reached that magical age of, well, I don’t really remember what age it was that I transitioned from Cubs to the full blown Boy Scouts. But the one thing I do remember is that I was NEVER worried about any kind of possible sexual abuse.

The Boy Scouts of America have announced that they are considering rescinding their decades old position of excluding homosexuals from membership and leadership.

“Considering”, “examining”, “looking into”, are all terms and phrases that basically mean the decision is already made! For as my friend Bryan Fischer has written, they would never in a million years float such an incendiary idea unless they had already made up their minds!

Some are appalled that we on the conservative, religious right are appalled! Let me see if I can explain.

My fondest memories of Scouting, beyond working on my radio merit badges at the state fair, were the camping excursions. My troop went camping a lot. I mean a lot! It seemed that we were either off camping somewhere or back at the troop house planing the next camping trip. We even had a unique camp site in south Mississippi that we named after our troop.

We loved to camp.

A lot!

Now just imagine with me for a moment what that camping environment would be like. (Here is where the ire of our detractors will come. They already anticipate where I’m going with this and they’re shouting at the page in anger!). Imagine with me a troop of young boys, ranging in ages from 12-16. These young boys are going to be out in the woods, away from their parents. Not just away from their parents but away from any contact with their parents! Back in my day, there were no cell phones. And today, most camps sites are out cell range.

They will be out in the woods for 2-4 days, nights, depending on what time of the year it is. They will sleep in pairs or threes, in sleeping bags, in tents or out in the open. They will shower or wash in the creeks or lakes that outline their camp site. It would be nothing for boys to wonder around with their shirts off, or sometimes just in their underwear or swim suit because they had just been to the “latrine” or to the swimming hole. These will all be under the direction of the Scout leader who lead them there.

Now, you could say that I am setting up a scenario that is just my own. That there are no reports of the kind of activities that my evil mind is conjuring up. That our homosexual friends want nothing more than to lead those young men to maturity and personal growth. And I’m evil for believing that such horrible thoughts could be reality!

But then, I would refer you again, to my friend Bryan Fischer’s latest article where he reminds us all of the Jerry Sandusky story! Say whatever you will about ole Jerry, but man on boy sex is homosexuality. There’s no other name for it!

I beg you to consider it in this light:
Gays say that they are made the way they are, that God has made them that way. So, first of all, would we not be asking a gay Scout leader to deny the “natural impulses of how God made him”!

We must also remember that a gay man would look at another male in the same way that a straight man would look at a female. So, with that in mind, change my camp scenario and make the scout leader a straight man and the kids he’s taken camping all beautiful teen age girls! You nor I WOULD EVER AGREE to that as a sensible and trustworthy environment for our children!

Why is it that we are fighting to set our kids up with gay men in that same kind of environment?

Don’t say it never happens! Don’t say that I’m dreaming up an unlikely scenario simply because I’m a part of a “hate group” (they call us haters because we tell the truth out of love for their eternal souls! They have redefined “disagreement” as “hate”!)

But I would tell you that what COULD happen was something that I NEVER worried about happening when I was Scout. Why? Because it was UNTHINKABLE in 1967 that our adults would EVER put their children in an environment where the unthinkable could happen!

Homosexuals would decry me as setting the scene to say that all homosexuals are pedophiles, or that pedophiles are all homosexuals.

But there is no mistaking the fact that homosexuals are known, by their own admission, to have multiple sexual partners, sometimes as many as a hundred or more partners. Shocking, I know! But you see, we make a dreadful mistake when we think of the homosexual relationship in the same vein as we would think of the average heterosexual relationship. They are NOT the same and they do not function the same.

I KNOW that all homosexuals are not pedophiles. But, ARE YOU WILLING TO TAKE A CHANCE WITH THE LIFE OF YOUR SON, that a homosexual that has been placed in the position of a Scout Leader, will not, will NEVER put your son in a compromising situation? Really? If you do, you’ve redefined “faith” in a whole new way for me!

The Scout oath requires a Scout to commit to “God and Country” to be “morally straight”. I don’t see how a Scout could ever make an oath before God to be morally straight when he has submitted himself to be led, trained, educated and modeled after one whom God has already described as immoral!

The gay community is very concerned about gay children being bullied and wrestling with suicide. I am dreadfully worried about those issues as well. No one wants a child to be bullied and certainly we would never want a child to wrestle with much less choose suicide! But what could happen when you place a gay kid in a group of straight kids in a closed environment such as Scouting is? Is there not an increased worry of bullying and rejection that might cause a child to think of suicide? I know, your answer to that is to knock down those barriers like the one Scouting has erected for more than a decade and blaze a new way for gay children to take a part in Scouting! Sounds really good, doesn’t it? Until you realize the kind of environment you’re talking about and develop those camping scenarios that I’ve outline above.

I didn’t have to worry that my scout leader was a man who liked men, and how that might play out once we all got to Camp 104 (not our real troop number!) and starting our weekend of camping. I didn’t have to worry about it because it would have been UNTHINKABLE.

It should be just as UNTHINKABLE for our kids of 2013 to have to worry about it as well!

That’s the Way God made us

As I’m sure you’ve heard by now, the Obama administration is lifting the restrictions on women serving in front line combat.

There are many objections to women serving in combat.  And I have to admit that I adhere to most of them.

But I hasten to add that I am extremely supportive of the roles women play in our arm services.  The simple fact is that without the role of women in the military we most likely could not make it work.

But I nevertheless also must speak my objection to the current rebirth of the idea of putting women in front line combat.  I know there are physiological differences between men and women that would make it difficult, but without apology, I will cling to the old adage that it’s the men that God designed to fight the fights and provide the security for the women and the children.

That’s they way God designed us and for that reason, I believe combat should be for the men among us only.

Thank You! Thank You!

I am so thankful for most the recent posts about me, your humble radio minister!

My Google Alerts have been a’buzz today because so many of those unknown, pro-homosexual bloggers get excited when they get new material from their sole source, Right Wing Watch. And even today, one of them posted my picture! Yay! (Like they’re revealing my confidential identity or something! Don’t tell them I have a whole page of pics at my FaceBook site! I enjoy watching them act like they discovered something!)

Anyway, THANK YOU so much for PROVING MY EARLIER BLOG TO BE TRUE!

I wrote last week that the pro-homosexual bloggers, and such, really were the meanest, most hateful people in the world! Even though the southern poverty law center has “designated” the AFA as an “official” hate group!

But with EVERY SINGLE BLOG ABOUT ME, with every single post, you guys PROVE ME RIGHT! I love it.

Like this gal who posted my picture…..(She posted it at Investor’s Hub??? Whatever!). She did her best to insult me by saying I was a “closeted gay man”! I mean, just watch them! The nastiness is thick!

And one guy said that all I knew to do was write run on sentences and that all I had was the exclamation key because I used it so much, and I mean, whoa, I just can’t believe someone would speak such mean things to me about me!!!

Thanks guys. I love the validation.

OBAMA DIDN’T LIKE HOW GIGLIO WAS HANDLED?

WASHINGTON – Sources close to the Oval Office are saying that there was disagreement within the Obama administration with how the Presidential Inaugural Committee (PIC) handled the Rev. Louie Giglio, after a liberal blog unearthed a mid-90s sermon where he defined homosexuality as a sin. Giglio, after accepting PIC’s invitation to give the inaugural benediction, declined the invitation after two days of controversy over his 17-year-old comments.

The PIC reportedly upset some White House officials when it began to pressure the evangelical pastor over his homosexual comments – though publicly both sides are saying he withdrew. PIC issued a statement claiming that Giglio does not reflect the Obama administration’s “vision of inclusion and acceptance for all Americans.” One source familiar with the process told CP that some White House officials disagreed with PIC’s statement, arguing that it is highly unlikely President Obama would define his “vision of inclusion” the same way as PIC – one that excludes Christians who have a traditional biblical view of homosexuality, as well as Muslims, Mormons, and Orthodox Jews who have similar views.

“The Inaugural Committee’s decision shouldn’t be taken as synonymous with the president’s breadth of inclusion,” the source told CP. “This decision shouldn’t be interpreted as President Obama’s definitive view of the inclusiveness of his administration.”

Sources say that PIC had already begun confronting Giglio before White House officials and President Obama received word of what was happening, and after Giglio’s decision to step away it was too complicated by then for them to intervene.

The White House Office of Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships did not respond to repeated efforts by CP for clarifications to questions regarding the matter by press time, but simply referred the matter to PIC.

Stephanie Young, PIC director of Constituency Press, responded to CP with the following statement: “The Pastor made his own decision to withdraw from participating in the Presidential Inaugural ceremony and to infer anything different does not reflect the facts.”

An inquiry to PIC if its statement on “vision of inclusion” represents that of President Obama went unanswered by press time. The Rev. Louie Giglio declined to comment on the article.

Giglio, founder of the Passion movement and pastor of Passion City Church in Roswell, Ga., was invited to give the benediction at President Obama’s inaugural swearing-in ceremony on Jan. 21, and PIC made that invitation public on Jan. 8. Just a day later, Think Progress, a liberal blog connected to the Center for American Progress, dug up a mid-1990s Giglio sermon about what the Bible says about homosexuality and described it as “vehemently anti-gay.” Two days after PIC’s enthusiastic announcement of the prominent Atlanta pastor for the inaugural benediction, the same committee asserted that including him doesn’t fit well with the administration’s “vision of inclusion.”

The online magazine Slate observed, “Even though he (Giglio) was the one who technically withdrew, the Presidential Inaugural Committee released a statement that certainly makes it sound like he was at the very least nudged.”

In Giglio’s mid-90s sermon, he also warned that gay activists were likely to seek to exclude Christians from the public forum for holding traditional biblical views of homosexuality. He said: “Underneath this issue is a very powerful and aggressive movement. That movement is not a benevolent movement, it is a movement to seize by any means necessary the feeling and the mood of the day, to the point where the homosexual lifestyle becomes accepted as a norm in our society and is given full standing as any other lifestyle, as it relates to family.”

In his statement stepping away from the benediction, Giglio said that his decision to withdraw his name comes from not wanting to make the issue of homosexuality the “focal point of the inauguration.” He also emphasized that “clearly” the issue of what the Bible says about homosexuality is not the priority or core message in his ministry, given that he has rarely spoken about it and the sermon cited is over a decade old.

“Neither I, nor our team, feel it best serves the core message and goals we are seeking to accomplish to be in a fight on an issue not of our choosing, thus I respectfully withdraw my acceptance of the President’s invitation,” stated Giglio.

In his sermon titled, “In Search of a Standard – Christian Response to Homosexuality,” delivered in the 1990s, Giglio said:

“We must lovingly but firmly respond to the aggressive agenda of not all, but of many in the homosexual community. … [I]f you look at the counsel of the word of God, Old Testament, New Testament, you come quickly to the conclusion that homosexuality is not an alternate lifestyle … homosexuality is not just a sexual preference, homosexuality is not gay, but homosexuality is sin. It is sin in the eyes of God, and it is sin according to the word of God. You come to only one conclusion: homosexuality is less than God’s best for his creation.”

The controversy surrounding Giglio and the inaugural benediction is similar to the uproar surrounding the Rev. Rick Warren delivering the inaugural prayer in 2009 for then President-elect Obama. At the time, gay rights activists had been up in arms that Warren, who supported California’s Proposition 8 measure that defines marriage as between one man and one woman, would be given such a prominent role at the historic ceremony – the swearing-in of the nation’s first black president.

However, Obama defended his decision to invite Warren to deliver the prayer, stating that his inauguration will feature “a wide range of viewpoints.”

“And that’s how it should be, because that’s what America is about,” Obama had said at a news conference when asked about inviting Warren to participate in his inaugural ceremony. “That’s part of the magic of this country is that we are diverse and noisy and opinionated.”

Can YOU Remember When…..

Multiple elected public officials, like Sheriffs, and GOVERNORS, have lined up to oppose a President’s “Orders” by saying that they will NOT obey them?

Mississippi Governor Phil Bryant urged the Mississippi legislature to quickly pass a bill that would make it ILLEGAL to obey or follow any Executive Order or Federal Law of any kind that infringed upon the Second Amendment Rights of Mississippians!

Incredible!

The newly re-elected President, who hasn’t even had his second inauguration, is finding that his new gun control edicts are so unpopular, that state officials are bold and courageous enough to publicly state they will NOT obey them because they would infringe upon the Constitutional right of their citizens.

And frankly they are morally correct to do so!  We are a nation governed by the Constitution of the United States!  And any law, order or instrument issued by the Executive Branch or the Legislative branch that would violate the Second Amendment of that Constitution, should be shunned and rejected.  Preferably, we’d love to see the Supreme Court declare such an order as unconstitutional.  And they eventually will, unless the President gets the opportunity to put more new Justices on the Court like Sonia Sotomayor who put the final nail in the coffin of Hobby Lobby over the ObamaCare contraceptive mandate!  Justices of her ilk will surely uphold anything this President sets in motion!

Yes, our government is divided and getting more so.  The elected officials who still believe the Constitution and are bold enough to uphold it and strong enough to refuse to violate it, Seem to be found at the State level moreso than the Federal.

But Praise God that they are there.

Jesus come Quickly!  We long for that day when God’s justice will reign over the universe.

Jesus WILL come.  He WILL reign.  He will NOT reign from Washington, DC.

But God’s Son will bring about “thy will on earth, as it is in Heaven…..”  Maranatha!

 

Tag Cloud

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 774 other followers